10-30-2017; Governor's Veto Blocks Two IL WC "Deforms" and The Focus on Lower WC Costs Turns to Our Hearing Officers; Peter Ferracuti, Rest In Peace and more

Synopsis: Two Kooky WC Legislative Efforts Die a Peaceful Death And The Focus on Lower IL WC Costs Turns To Our Hearing Officers.

Editor’s comment: To my understanding, this dumb idea started with the public relations forces of ITLA or the IL Trial Lawyers Ass’n. In response to high costs in the IL WC system being a source of criticism by Governor Rauner, the IL State Chamber and other business groups, some ITLA rocket scientist came up with the idea that multi-zillion dollar insurance carriers were somehow manipulating “profits” and thereby causing IL WC premiums to be higher than other States. It couldn’t have been all the favorable rulings and high awards and ever-spiraling rates that happened in the Blagojevich era when he traded votes for control of the IWCC to the nice Claimant bar from Madison and St. Clair County. NOOOOO!! It was those unnamed insurance carriers—in response, the idea was to snip $10M out of the IWCC’s annual budget to start a tiny, truly miniscule State WC Mutual insurance carrier that would put all the industry giants to shame. Right?

 

Wrong. I truly doubt this idea would have ever actually been implemented, even if the IL General Assembly had passed it. I think it would have gone to the same junk heap the IL State WC Oversight Panel For State Workers Committee is on—they spent hours and hours debating the makeup of that panel and what it would do and they never met, not even once. It all sounded good when it got passed but fizzled in execution while the State still shovels millions to our IL government workers who then support and vote for the politicians shoveling them money.

Either way, last week, you and I and all my readers hailed another victory when the bill that would establish an IL State workers' compensation mutual insurance company funded by a $10 million loan from the Illinois Workers' Compensation Operations Fund failed to receive 71 votes required to override Governor Rauner’s veto. Under the proposal, the $10 million was to be an intergovernmental loan to be paid back to the IWCC with interest. As I indicate above, financial repayment in our State gov’t is usually a wish and a prayer.

 

The amazing WC gurus at the IL State Chamber also opposed the proposal because it required this new State insurer to be included in the State's Guaranty Fund which pays claims made against insolvent insurance companies in all lines of insurance, not just workers' compensation. Should the State WC Insurance Fund be declared insolvent for their liabilities in unlimited amounts, this exposure/loss would be absorbed by the Guaranty Fund and then assessed back against all private property and casualty insurers, including homeowners' insurers, whose customers would likely share the new and unprecedented cost burden. Illinois homeowners and auto insurance customers would also have the potential responsibility to bail out this State workers' compensation insurance fund should it be poorly run and then fail.

 

The Other Dopey IL WC “Deform” Was HB 2525.

This bill would place price controls on workers comp insurers selling policies in Illinois. Steve Schneider of the American Insurance Ass’n said: “It's the harshest and most opposed regulatory type of structure that I have ever seen because we are going to have to seek permission from the government to charge a final price on the workers compensation insurance that we provide to our customers. Part of the decision-making by the state ... is whether those premiums are reasonable, and we just think that is an extraordinarily broad reach of power for the government to assume … we are opposing H.B. 2525 on that basis,” he continued. “The sponsors of the bill have put in some weak language designed to give us the gloss of reform, but it is simply insufficient. There is no independent verification of the amount or types of savings that this legislation would produce.”

This bill also tried to codify the “traveling employee” concept for the first time, as if the Supreme Court hadn’t rejected that concept when they last considered it.

The motion to override the veto of HB2525, a bill sponsored by Rep. Jay Hoffman (D-Swansea)/Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago), was not called for a vote. Consequently, under the IL Constitution the 15 day period to call a veto override expired. Good riddens to bad rubbish.

 

What Was Bad About These Nutty Bills?

 

They were designed to and did deflect any real WC legislative change or reform in this State. This important debate went down an endless side-track to nowhere with consideration of these two “fake” bills.

 

What is Good About The IL WC System?

 

We have lots of very solid Arbitrators and Commissioners who are dedicated to bringing this State back to the middle of the U.S. in terms of WC costs and premiums. We also feel the message has made it to the IL Appellate Court, WC Division that is taking a more traditional role in overseeing the IL WC system—happy to explain. Please note the impact of these new and improved hearing officers, judges and justice won’t happen in a day or three. It will be a couple of years for their rulings and settlements to show improvement for our WC risk, business, claims and insurance community. The hearing officers also want truly injured workers to be properly taken care of and protected under the IL WC Act and Rules.

 

As we have asked in the past, if you or your claims team see a rotten or shockingly bad IL WC decision, send it along for our complaint box.

 

That said, we truly feel things are looking up and ask our readers to be patient. We appreciate your thoughts and comments. Please post them on our award-winning blog.

 

 

Synopsis: Peter Ferracuti, Rest in Peace.

 

Editor’s comment: Peter F. Ferracuti, 91, of Ottawa, IL passed away last Tuesday at OSF St. Elizabeth Medical Center. Private family services will be held. Ottawa Funeral Home has been entrusted with his services.

 

Peter Ferracuti will always be remembered as something of a legend, for better or for worse in the Central IL WC community. He was born March 11, 1926 in Ottawa, Illinois. He married the love of his life, Janis Carder, on January 11, 1985 and they were married almost 33 years at the time of his passing. He graduated in 1944 from Ottawa Township High School and was the President of his Senior Class. After high school, he proudly served in the United States Navy from 1944-1946 during WWII in the Pacific Theater.

 

Peter graduated in the upper 3% of his class from the University of Illinois, School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, with a double major in Political Science and Psychology. Thereafter, he received his law degree from the University of Illinois Law School. In 1953, he was licensed to practice in the State of Illinois. Since 1983, Attorney Peter F. Ferracuti has been listed in several editions of the national publication, "Best Lawyers in America", being 1 of only 18 civil litigation attorneys similarly recognized from the State of Illinois in that publication. He was an active member of the American Association for Justice, Illinois Trial Lawyers Association and the Workers' Compensation Lawyers of America. He is a life member of the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum.

 

Memorials may be directed to the Peter F. Ferracuti Scholarships for Building the Trades and the Advocacy Scholarship which are for $500 each per year and are offered at both Ottawa Township High School and LaSalle Peru High School to ensure students have access to the education and training necessary to join the trades community and to become an attorney.

 

http://www.ottawafuneralhome.com/memsol.cgi?user_id=2028760

 

From Gene Keefe

 

My favorite story about this hard-working advocate is Peter would appear at a Commission status call and take his Dictaphone and, while talking to me, start dictation during our conversation. Having seen this a couple of times, I would then get my own Dictaphone and while he was talking, I would dictate what he was saying. He got flustered but we laughed about the fate of busy lawyers. He later walked up and could see he was going to be talking to me and stopped dictating during our conversations. Out of respect for Peter, so did I. I was routinely amazed at how organized Peter was when handling the large number of files he brought to each call.

 

Peter was not known as a free-spender. Due to his thrift in running his firm, Peter has lots of former associate attorneys, across the middle of the State, who left to start their own practices to seek a more solid income. When I started my own law firm, I tried to be an all-business manager, as Peter was but I did try to pay my team members rewards for their hard work.

 

Peter was somewhat famous when he sued Will County because, to get in the fast-track attorney line that allowed you into their crowded court building, they wanted you to join and pay dues to the Will County Bar Ass'n. Peter unquestionably had the money but didn’t want to feel like he was forced to join the Bar Ass’n just to get into court as an attorney. I am fairly sure he was successful in changing the concept.

 

Peter also became mildly famous or infamous when he sued his son, Drew Ferracuti for opening his version of the Ferracuti Law Office, as if the son could use a different name. Per a court order, the names of the two shops are now the Law Office of Peter Ferracuti and the Law Office of Drew Ferracuti. Drew is one of the better and more knowledgeable Claimant lawyers in the middle of the State.

 

I published this blurb about that fight a couple years ago:

 

o   THE LAW OFFICES OF PETER F. FERRACUTI, P.C. vs. DREW J. FERRACUTI, DREW FERRACUTI LAW FIRM, d/b/a FERRACUTI LAW FIRM

 

o   Case Number: 2011C7265 Type Of Case: Trademark Infringement

 

o   An Ottawa, Illinois based law firm is suing another law firm in the same city, alleging trademark violations.

 

o   We note Peter Ferracuti was licensed to practice law in Illinois in 1953. His son, Drew started as a lawyer in 1987. We understand Peter gave their last name to his son at birth without any fees, costs or non-compete contracts involved. We also note both lawyers are among the top of the practice in the central part of our state. We hope they can patch this up and continue to serve injured workers.

 

Peter was a solid and strong advocate for Illinois’ injured workers. His memory, good, quiet and earnest, will always be a part of my legal career and life. He will always be missed.