1-31-2020; Is Coronavirus “Covered” Under Workers’ Comp?; Plans to Keep Medical Marijuana out of Workers’ Compensation May be Going Up In Smoke! by Matt Ignoffo, JD and more

Synopsis: Is Coronavirus “Covered” Under Workers’ Comp?

Coronavirus has just been designated a global health emergency by WHO or the World Health Organization. This viral disease is spreading across the globe and is in our country right now.

It is important for risk managers to understand the crisis and, as the scouts say, be prepared! The answer to the simple question “is coronavirus covered under workers’ comp” is yes and no—it is not a work injury so that wouldn’t be an issue. But coronavirus could be an occupational disease if it was contracted as part of work. If one of your workers suffers from this disease, you need to investigate, determine compensability and if they contracted coronavirus as an OccDisease, pay for medical care and lost time related to the virus.

What is an Occupational Disease?

Occupational disease is defined as a chronic disorder caused by work activities or environmental conditions within the workplace. Occupational diseases can affect various parts of the body, such as the bones, lungs, and muscles. Common types of occupational diseases include:

  • Contact dermatitis

  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

  • Bronchitis

  • Asbestosis

  • Lateral epicondylitis, also known as tennis elbow

  • Asthma

  • Cancer

  • Rabies

 

What Causes an Occupational Disease?

There are many workplace factors that can result in on-to-job illnesses for your workers.  For instance, an employee can fall ill after being exposed to harmful gases or chemicals used in business operations. The key is to confirm it is a workplace exposure and not a general life exposure.

Who is at Risk?

It’s important to understand that every business carries some risk of their employees developing an occupational disease. Everyone feels the coronavirus will be contracted from foreign travel, particularly to China and in meetings with workers who have traveled abroad.

How Do Occupational Diseases Affect Your Workers Compensation/OccDisease Insurance?

If an employee is claiming an occupational disease, they must prove the exposure was caused by a hazard existing in or from the workplace. Additionally, symptoms of the disease must also be consistent with other documented cases of the illness. To my understanding, if you are covered for WC, you are covered for OD.

If the employee can prove their ailment was due to their work activities or environment, then your Workers Compensation/OccDisease coverage and handling will proceed as usual. Risk managers need to be sure to do a full and thorough incident/exposure investigation.

What is Coronavirus?

Coronavirus is a new respiratory virus or “bug” first isolated in Wuhan, China. The virus is contagious and potentially fatal for about 3% of those who contract the virus. It is suspected coronavirus it is transmitted through coughing and sneezing of infected individuals. At the present time, there is no vaccine, cure or specific treatment.

How is Coronavirus spread?

Health authorities have not confirmed how Coronavirus is transmitted, but suspect it is spread person-to-person. There is also evidence the virus has been spread by infected animals, including humans with links to seafood or animal handling and markets. Epidemiologists do not believe you can get coronavirus from air, water or food.

How many people survive Coronavirus?

Currently, Coronavirus has a fatality rate of less than 3%. As such, the vast majority of those affected have survived the disease. Please remember an Illinois WC fatality due to OccDisease can bring reserves well into the millions. Happy to explain, if you need that math.

What are the signs and symptoms of Coronavirus?

Individuals infected with Coronavirus have displayed the following symptoms:

1.                  Mild to severe respiratory illness;

2.                  Fever;

3.                  Cough;

4.                  Difficulty breathing; and

5.                  Death.

How infectious is Coronavirus?

Virus transmission happens on a spectrum and health/medical authorities are not sure if the virus is highly contagious, or less so. For person-to-person transmission, health authorities suspect the virus is spread through coughing and sneezing, similar to how influenza and other respiratory pathogens are spread. The incubation period from first exposure or the time interval from infection to onset of respiratory distress symptoms, is 2-14 days. During this period, an individual can be infected and may be innocently spreading the disease although they may not be experiencing the signs and symptoms of the virus. This is going to require travelers and high-risk individuals to be quarantined.

How can my company protect itself?

Because there is currently no vaccine to prevent infection, the best way to protect yourself is to avoid being exposed to this virus. The CDC recommends the following additional steps:

·                     Wash your hands often!! Use soap and water for at least 20 seconds. Use an alcohol-based hand sanitizer that contains at least 60% alcohol if soap and water are not available.

·                     Avoid touching your eyes, nose, and mouth with unwashed hands.

·                     Avoid people who are sick.

·                     Stay home when you are sick.

·                     Cover your cough or sneeze with a tissue, then throw the tissue in the trash. If you don’t have a tissue, cough into your elbow.

·                     Clean and disinfect frequently touched objects and surfaces.

What happens if I suspect I or someone I know has Coronavirus?

If you exhibit symptoms of Coronavirus within two weeks of traveling from China, you should contact a healthcare professional and mention your recent travel. If you have had close contact with someone exhibiting Coronavirus symptoms who has recently travelled from China, you should call ahead to a healthcare professional and mention your close contact and their recent travel. Your healthcare professional will work with your state’s public health department and CDC to determine if you need to be tested for Coronavirus.

Should I consider quarantining employees, or having employees remain off work, who have recently returned from China?

You should consider telling any employee returning from China that they should remain away from work for fourteen days from their return. You can also consider telling the employees to self-monitor for any symptoms of Coronavirus. If any of these symptoms occur, the employee should consider being evaluated by a healthcare provider. Further, even if not symptomatic, employees may also want to consult a healthcare provider to confirm that the employee is not infectious before returning to work.

Can/Should Your Company Restrict Employees from Traveling to China?

Yes. Employers may consider restricting employee travel to the particular areas affected by the disease for business purposes. Employers may also consider requesting employees inform the employer if they are traveling for personal reasons so the employer is aware of employees who are going to areas and are exposed to the disease. Employees who travel to China need to be informed that they may be quarantined upon their return. Employees should also be informed that there may not be adequate medical services available if they travel to China and become ill.

Does FMLA leave apply for our Employees, or immediate family members, who may contract Coronavirus?

Remember FMLA is unpaid leave. FMLA could apply to work exposures and it is available for folks that took personal trips to China. Therefore, assuming FMLA applies to the employer and the worker(s) qualify for such leave, Coronavirus would qualify as a “serious health condition” under FMLA allowing an employee to take FMLA leave if either the employee contracts the disease or an immediate family member contracts the disease. The employee would be entitled to job reinstatement as well.

Would Our Company need to pay Workers’ Compensation/OccDisease Benefits for Employees who contract Coronavirus?

Perhaps, if the employee contracted the disease in the course of their employment. The issue to resolve--does the employee’s work require them to be exposed to persons who are infected, typically healthcare workers. It is going to be interesting/challenging to see what an employer would have to do if one worker secretly traveled to China and then returned to infect co-workers without knowing it. Let’s hope that doesn’t happen.

If there is Workers’ Compensation/OccDisease liability, employers are responsible for covering the costs of reasonable and necessarily medical care, temporary total disability benefits, and permanent disability (if any). Employers should engage a competent medical professional on infectious diseases for advice to determine whether the disease is work-related.

Does ADA restrict how we interact with our employees due to Coronavirus?

No. The ADA protects employees with disabilities, but during a global health emergency, as recently declared by the World Health Organization, employees can be required to be medically examined to determine if they have contracted the disease. Also, voluntary medical exams are always permitted, if performed confidentially. The EEOC has suggested materials to distribute to the workforce in the event of global health emergency.

The ADA protects qualified employees with disabilities from discrimination. A disability may be a chronic physical condition, such as breathing. Employees may be entitled to an “accommodation” such as leave or be allowed to work away from work for a limited period. Employees who have contracted the virus must be treated the same as non-infected employees, as long as the infected employees can perform their essential job functions. If the employee poses a health or safety threat to the workforce, the employer may place the employee on leave.

I appreciate your thoughts and comments. Please post them on our award-winning blog.

                ----------------------------------------------------------

 

Synopsis: Plans to Keep Medical Marijuana out of Workers’ Compensation May be Going Up In Smoke! Research and writing by Matt Ignoffo, JD.

Editor’s Comment: On January 13, 2020, the New Jersey Appellate Court issued a decision in Hager v. M&K Construction where it held an employer needs to reimburse an injured worker of his expense for medical marijuana. In a case of first impression, the Court ruled on multiple arguments the employer made:

  • M&K Construction argued the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which makes it a crime to manufacture, possess or distribute marijuana, preempted the NJ Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act (MMA) because it is impossible to comply with both statutes;

  • M&K argued in order to comply with the lower court’s order to reimburse the employee such order violates the Controlled Substances Act because it requires M&K to aid and abet the injured worker’s possession of an illegal substance.

  • M&K argued it should be treated similarly to a private health insurer, which under the MMA is not required to reimburse costs of medical marijuana.

  • M&K argued the lower court erred in failing to consider whether medical marijuana was a reasonable and necessary form of treatment under the NJ Workers’ Compensation Act.

The Appellate court concluded the order did not require M&K to possess, manufacture or distribute marijuana. The order only confirmed M&K’s obligation to reimburse the injured worker for his purchase of medical marijuana. As such, the court indicated there was no conflict between the Controlled Substances Act and the NJ medical marijuana statute.

Furthermore, M&K's compliance with the order does not establish the specific intent element of an aiding and abetting offense under federal law.

The Court addressed the private insurer argument, but came to the simple conclusion that M&K is not a private health insurer. Therefore, it is not excluded under the MMA from reimbursing the costs of medical marijuana.

The court commented on the facts of the particular case in addressing whether marijuana was reasonable and necessary under the WC Act. It opined, where the injured worker demonstrated the severity and chronic nature of his pain, his attempts to unsuccessfully alleviate the pain with multiple surgeries and medical modalities, and the validated efficacy of the prescribed medical marijuana, it held the use of medical marijuana to be reasonable and necessary.

The lower court decision included a discussion on opioid medication, which the injured worker had tried previously with an indication that in 2015 he was addicted to opioids. Apparently, through the medical marijuana program, the injured worker was able to improve his condition and had been opioid-free for several years. Therefore, the lower court concluded the benefits of medical marijuana were superior to the use of opioids and the use of medical marijuana was in the injured worker's best interests.

As the Appellate Court found no legislative or legal barrier to an employer's reimbursement of its employee's expense for medical marijuana in a workers' compensation setting, it affirmed the lower court’s order indicating the employer is liable for reimbursement.

Such rulings would appear to be a trend in the overall shift in how the country feels about medical and even adult personal use of marijuana. We will report on any further decisions with a special interest in court opinions addressing not only the conflicts in state and federal law, but marijuana use in conjunction with an employer’s right to maintain a zero tolerance policies.

This article was researched and written by Matthew Ignoffo, J.D., M.S.C.C., who practices in Illinois and Wisconsin. Please feel free to contact Matt at mignoffo@keefe-law.com.

1-14-2020; Thoughts from Dr. David Fletcher and Gene Keefe on Recreational Marijuana and WC Claims; Weird New Illinois Laws for Employers to Know of and more

Synopsis: Dr. David Fletcher and Gene Keefe Provide More Thoughts on Recreational/Medical Marijuana for Risk Managers.

 

Editor’s comment: Please consider the impact of recreational marijuana  on employer drug testing programs. Dr. Fletcher is a director of SafeWorks Illinois and wanted to share these thoughts and slides for your consideration in managing your workforce.

 

Several central IL employers are going to stop testing for MJ starting January 1, 2020. The team at SafeWorks is scrambling to get test kits that do not test for Marijuana.

 

Dr. Fletcher and I don’t feel this is strong advice. Contrary to many so-called “experts” that are advising employers to stop testing for marijuana, informed employers can rest assured that their reasonable drug and alcohol testing programs can remain intact thanks to the passage and signing of the “Recreational Marijuana Workplace Protections Enhanced in Veto Session PA 101-253 (Section 10-50  of the Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act)”.

 

It is business as usual for employers who have established zero tolerance drug and alcohol policies. They can continue to drug test for marijuana as they feel best and not hire prospective employees who test positive as well as discipline current employees who test positive for marijuana use at work according to the employer’s substance abuse policy.

 

My worry for all employers across the country is simple—if you don’t drug test and one of your workers who is stoned makes a mistake and hurts lots of people, you may be looking at six-seven-eight-figure damages and, worse, punitive damages. For that reason alone, I join with Dr. Fletcher to tell everyone to dig in and test for marijuana, as part of good business practice.

 

Dr. Fletcher and I have been doing a lot of reasonable cause supervisor training lately (see below a few slides from SafeWorks and Dr. Fletcher that outline the employer protections). Dr. Fletcher is advocating switching to oral fluid testing for reasonable cause due to the earlier window of detection compared to urine testing. If you want a presentation from the defense team at KCB&A, send a reply.

 

Hound Labs May Have Developed the Ultimate Marijuana Breathalyzer

 

Hound Labs is a breath technology company that has developed ultra-sensitive technology for non-invasive breath measurement. Utilizing groundbreaking technology, the Hound® marijuana breathalyzer is the world’s first breathalyzer to rapidly, accurately, and inexpensively measure recent marijuana use and alcohol in a person’s breath. The Hound breathalyzer is intended for law enforcement, employer, and insurance purposes only. Based out of Oakland, CA and founded by a physician, they are hoping to make a big impact on employer testing for marijuana use and impairment.

 

Take a look at their website: https://houndlabs.com/

 

Another company with similar results and trying to hit the market hard is Cannabix Technologies—check out their website at http://www.cannabixtechnologies.com/thc-breathalyzer.html

 

I will continue to report progress to my readers as I learn of it.

 

Going back to Illinois and managing marijuana use in your workforce

 

Here are some illustrative slides, created by Dr. Fletcher and the team at SafeWorks.

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 I appreciate your thoughts and comments. Please post them on our award-winning blog.

 

 

Synopsis: Weird New Illinois Laws for Everyone to be Aware Of.

 

Editor’s Comment: Whenever a legislature is busy and doesn’t have a two-party system to keep it on track, you are going to get weird laws. Here are some from Illinois.

 

From the WC industry perspective, the new minimum wage laws are going to change wage loss differential claims in workers’ comp.

 

Here are some of the new Illinois laws for 2020 that may affect you:

 

  • NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS SET FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE/COMPUTERIZED VIDEO INTERVIEWS OF JOB APPLICANTS: There are a number of companies, particularly in the financial sector, that appear to be doing the first interview by computer. If you use computers for interviews, basically, you have explain it and get agreement to do it. Employers who ask applicants for permission to record video interviews and use an artificial intelligence analysis of applicant during recording are covered. Submitted videos shall notify each applicant before the interview that AI may be used to analyze the applicant’s facial expressions and consider the applicant’s fitness for the position. Employers must provide each applicant with an information sheet before the interview explaining how AI works and what characteristics it uses to evaluate applicants. In addition, the applicant must consent to be evaluated by the AI program.

 

  • PERSONAL INFORMATION PROTECTION: This new law provides that where a single data breach affects more than 500 Illinois residents, the breach must be reported to the Illinois Attorney General. Call your insurance broker to confirm you have cyber-coverage for the increased cost.

 

  • LEGALIZATION OF PERSONAL and RECREATIONAL USE OF MARIJUANA: The Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act allows for the recreational use of cannabis by individuals over the age of 21. Illinois citizens may possess up to 30 grams of cannabis and out of state individuals may possess up to 15 grams. You can only buy marijuana at state-licensed dispensaries, and only partake in the privacy of your own home. Landlords can prohibit cannabis use in their properties, and employers can still prohibit its use and drug test employees. Growing marijuana plants is only allowed for medical patients and even then, they can only have five plants. The Act establishes guidelines pertaining to expungement of records for possession of cannabis, taxation on cannabis, including numerous changes and additions to Illinois law.

 

  • HIGHER EDUCATION SAVINGS PROGRAM: Every Illinois child will have a 529 savings account! The State Treasurer shall administer the Illinois Higher Education Savings Program, subject to appropriation, beginning in 2021, which will ensure that a 529 college savings account is automatically opened for every child born in Illinois, with an initial deposit in the amount of $50.

 

  • DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WAGE RECOVERY FROM EMPLOYERS: Restaurant employers beware—this new law provides that gratuities are the property of employees and that employers shall pay gratuities to employees within 13 days after the end of the pay period during which the gratuities were earned.

 

  • INCREASE IN MINIMUM WAGE: The minimum wage will go up and then up again. Beginning Jan. 1, 2020, minimum wage will jump from $8.25 to $9.25 statewide, with the minimum wage for tipped workers and employees under 18 (only those working part-time) increasing proportionally as well. Then in July, it will increase again to $10, then $11 beginning on Jan. 1, 2021. It will keep climbing until it reaches $15 per hour beginning on Jan. 1, 2025. Each employer with 50 or fewer full-time equivalent employees may claim a credit against payments as set out in the new law.

 

  • WORKPLACE TRANSPARENCY ACT: On June 2, the General Assembly, through bipartisan efforts, passed SB 75, which created three new laws and amended others that relate to sexual harassment and discrimination. On Aug. 9, Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed SB 75, Public Act 101-0221, into law, comprehensively re-shaping the landscape of sexual harassment and discrimination law in Illinois. The new law not only prohibits unilateral agreements to arbitrate claims involving discrimination, harassment, and retaliation for complaining about discrimination or harassment, but also changes sexual harassment reporting and training requirements and impacts how union representation is handled during the course of proceedings related to claims of sexual harassment.

 

  • BATHROOM SIGNAGE: “Whichever”… Every single-occupancy restroom in a place of public accommodation shall be identified as “restroom” and not indicate a specific gender.

 

  • BABY CHANGING FACILITY IN PUBLIC BUILDING: Requires that there be at least one baby diaper changing station in women’s and men’s public bathroom, contained within a public building. Signage must be visible.

 

  • GENDER DESIGNATIONS ON STATE DOCUMENTS: Authorizes the Secretary of State to permit applicants for identification documents to choose between “male,” “female,” or “non-binary” when designating the applicant’s sex on identification card and driver’s license application forms.

 

  • CONSTRUCTION ZONE PENALTY: Drivers who fail to obey any official traffic-control device shall be fined no less than $100 and no more than $1,000. Penalties for violation of the requirement to use caution in approaching or entering a highway construction or maintenance area or zone increase from a maximum fine of $10,000 to a maximum fine of $25,000.

 

  • SCOTT’S LAW UPDATES: Scott’s Law requires drivers to change lanes, slow down and proceed with caution in approaching emergency vehicles or disabled cars on the side of the highway. Further requires a motorist who is not able to change lanes to reduce speed and leave a safe distance between them and the stationary vehicles. Penalties for first offense are increased from $100 to $250 and second offense from $750 to $10,000.

 

  • DRIVERS BEING ADVISED TO USE THE “ZIPPER MERGE METHOD”: The “zipper merge” method of merging occurs when vehicles run in parallel until one lane physically narrows. The vehicles traveling in the open lane should allow the vehicles in the closing lane to enter the open lane on an alternate car basis.

 

I appreciate your thoughts and comments. Please post them on our award-winning blog.

1-6-2020; Marijuana Now Legal In Illinois--What Do Employers Do?; Gene Keefe's Thoughts That Illinois Has a LOT of WC Administrators and more

Synopsis: Marijuana Now Legal in Illinois—What Do Employers Do?

 

Editor’s comment: Marijuana became legal in Illinois last week. Illinois employers face a brave, new world on what to do about marijuana in the workplace. Crain’s Chicago Business reported the State of Illinois raked in $3.2M the first day of marijuana sales, guaranteeing the worst run State in the United States is going to latch on to this cash cow and milk it for all its worth, regardless of the dangers and costs to employers and local governments.

 

Drug/Alcohol Testing and Policies are Important But So Is Common Sense

 

The biggest concern for employers is to send out a clear signal your workers can’t be impaired and work for you. There is no job that is truly “safe” for the worker, their co-workers and the public if someone is intoxicated/impaired in your workplace. Things can get ugly very rapidly, if you don’t clamp down. You have to send a message that your work sites have to be drug and alcohol-free at all times—if you don’t do so, you will subject your organization to stratospheric liability for all sort of damages including punitive damages.

 

My common sense theory on controlling marijuana and all intoxicants in your workforce is simple and based in common sense. A couple of years ago, I had some mail room employees who were “huffing” during work. The process of “huffing” is intoxicative inhaling, sometimes using pressurized gas, to get a moderate high. It was very easy to note the workers were doing this and they were a menace to themselves and those around them due to their moderate state of intoxication. Several staff members alerted me to the situation and I sat down with these stoner workers and laid down the law—I told them I wouldn’t stand for intoxication in our law office and they were warned in writing not to do it again. As sure as shooting, they did it again and I documented it and fired all of them. Please remember documentation is your best protection against EPLI or employment practices claims.

 

From my perspective, all Illinois employers have to have a razor focus about any worker using marijuana or being impaired from marijuana in the workplace. Please note there aren’t really “tests” for huffing. You would have to know what the workers were using to test for it and I assure you the workers weren’t telling anyone and were hiding the inhalants. I was not focused on blood/intoxicant levels—my goal was to avoid anyone who was impaired from endangering the rest of us.

 

Similarly, you can’t yet scientifically “test” for marijuana, like you can for alcohol. Marijuana testing will basically allow you to know if the worker used or was around marijuana within the last 30 days. There is no chemical test that, by itself, is scientifically significant in demonstrating marijuana impairment levels. If you feel urine or saliva testing for marijuana will have an impact on keeping your workers away from this intoxicant in your workplace, then by all means test. But my advice is to make sure all your workers are keenly aware you aren’t going to tolerate any level of impairment and will follow your personnel policies, leading to termination.

 

As part of my recommendations, take a look at https://www.workrights.org/nwi_drugTesting_impairmentTesting.html. They seem to be a fairly liberal group but I feel they did a solid study on various approaches to workplace impairment testing of all kinds and they don’t pick one of them. They do include urine testing as part of their studies. Their focus parallels my recommendation for all Illinois employers:

 

Impairment testing is the practice of determining which workers in safety sensitive positions put themselves and others at risk by directly measuring workers’ current fitness for duty. Urine testing, in contrast, attempts to determine which workers have used specific substances known to cause impairment in the relatively recent past. Experts have long recognized that impairment testing has inherent advantages that make it potentially superior to urine testing as a method of improving workplace safety. This study set out to learn whether impairment testing has lived up to this potential in practice.

Please also note IL House Bill 1438, the Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act, which Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed into law in June, allows employers to institute “reasonable” zero-tolerance drug policies.

Transportation workers are governed by Department of Transportation federal regulations, which strictly forbid levels of THC above 5 nanograms in the blood or above 10 nanograms in saliva or urine. The goal is to have little or no tolerance for workers who can put lots of folks at risk if they are impaired. As I outline above, other impairment inquiries/tests also should have a strong role, depending on how much risk you have in your company.

My law partner Brad Smith confirms the strongest advice he can provide is for all Illinois employers to develop personnel policies that outline your company's lack of tolerance of drug use by all workers at every level. Brad can be reached at bsmith@keefe-law.com for questions, concerns and advice.

There Remains a Statutory WC Presumption Against Injuries When You Can Prove an IL Worker Is Impaired

Please note the IL WC Act still provides a presumption against compensability if a worker can be shown to have suffered injury due to intoxication from marijuana. What I have always told my law students and others—if a worker has a hammer dropped on them and they suffer injury regardless of impairment, accept and pay the claim. If the worker is stoned and starts juggling hammers and sticks their arm with one, the presumption should block compensability. As Brad Smith says—Document, Document, Document to provide strong protection against WC claims arising from impaired workers.

The new law makes Illinois **puff** the 11th state to legalize recreational marijuana, along with Alaska, Washington state, Oregon, Nevada, California, Colorado, Michigan, Vermont, Massachusetts and Maine.

I appreciate your thoughts and comments. Please post them on our award-winning blog.

Synopsis: Yes, Illinois Has a LOT of WC Administrators and Featherbedding in Other State Agencies Across the Board—A Lonely Voice from Gene Keefe.

Editor’s comment: I was quoted last week in Work Comp Central for my reasoned opinion the IL WC system has too many administrators for the ever-dwindling number of claims. To my understanding, the IL WC system has 34 Arbitrators, 9 Commissioners and 18 staff attorneys who provide support for the Commissioners. Along with Chairman Brennan, that makes 62 IL WC administrators, all of whom are making around or more than six figures. In contrast, the Indiana WC system has five, count ‘em, just five hearing officers.

I am not advocating termination of hard-working and professional WC administrators across our State. The IL WC Commission has about seven different “advisory panels” and I suggest several of them take up the topic of trying to match the amount of administrative/legal work to the number of people doing it. I have never seen anyone take up that task and strive for what is called “efficiency” in my forty years of watching this place operate. It is high time someone did so.

Please don’t shoot the messenger. I am trying to let my readers know Illinois remains one of the worst-run and highest debt States in the history of the United States. Every day it is getting worse and taxes are spiraling, driving folks to other places to live and work. At some point, this State is going to be the financial equivalent of the Titanic right after it hit the iceberg—it is certain to fail but it may be hard to tell precisely when that might happen. Unlike Brad Pitt in his acceptance speech last night, I don’t want to have to “share the raft” after Illinois government fails. Our IL State Government wastes money in so many ways it is hard to countenance things like:

  • There are 88 IL State Agencies that should be consolidated to about 10 or 15, as other States have done. The 88 Agencies have 88 Agency Heads with 88 Assistants to the Agency Heads and 88 HR managers and 88 Accountants and 88 Logistics, etc. In short, redundant job after redundant job.

  • There are 7 Different and Independent IL State Police Departments—what do we need a “Commerce Commission” Police Department for? Can’t all the police operations be consolidated under the IL State Police?

  • Along with the 88 State Agencies, the State of Illinois has probably well over a hundred Commissions and Councils and Boards and Authorities—are you starting to notice a trend?-

  • We have almost 7,000 taxing bodies in this State, around triple the next highest State for taxing bodies.

Going back to the IWCC and “efficiency,” you may note every single penny of the budget and expenditures of the IWCC are paid for via levies on IL businesses and insurance carriers. The owners of those businesses are facing a staggering income tax increase if our Governor gets his way. Our workers’ comp system, which is dominated by the forces of IL labor get no money from labor. Labor unions have no true “skin in the game” when allowing millions in salaries for our numerous WC administrators.

Right now, I feel I am the only IL WC Commission watcher who has the guts to confirm on simple point—we need to take a hard look at every penny spent on IL State Government if we are going to have an IL State Government that is going to pay its bills in a timely fashion and provide efficient and effective government services to those who remain in this State. I hope the great legislative gurus at the IL State Chamber and Crain’s Chicago Business and every other media outlet starts to listen to my lonely voice on this concept.

I appreciate your thoughts and comments. Please post them on our award-winning blog.