3-9-12; Ouch!! Northwestern Memorial Hospital gets hit with WC “balance billing” class action

We knew it had to happen. Balance billing in the workers’ compensation arena was outlawed in this state in 2005-6 when Section 8a.2 was added to our IL WC Act. Effectively what happens is doctors/hospitals charge “sticker price” for medical care but are willing to routinely accept less for their services, just like car dealers do. The problem arises when the discounts aren’t honored and medical bills for the discounted amounts continue to be sent. The doctor or hospital is “billing” the “balance” they agreed to take as a discount.

When “balance bills” are received by injured workers, lots of confused consumers along with the respective workers’ comp insurers and TPA’s may pay medical bills they don't actually owe. Typically this occurs when WC insurance offers or pays discounted values that are less than what a doctor, hospital, or lab service initially sought to be paid. The health-care provider may repeatedly demand the balance from the innocent patient. On some occasions, in response to penalty and fee petitions, WC adjusters or injured workers may pay up.

“Balance billing” is illegal but one odd aspect of the changes to our IL WC Act in 2005-6 is they didn’t provide any statutory penalty for the practice.. When doctors or hospitals assert a WC insurer has reimbursed too little, Illinois law bars the medical providers from pressuring injured workers to pay the difference. Instead, doctors and hospitals should be directing their concerns to the insurers/TPA’s and leave the patient out of the loop. Economists and patient advocates estimate consumers pay $1 billion or more a year for which they're not responsible.

Our readers and clients ask us all the time what to do about balance bills—how do you best handle them; particularly when you have told the provider repeatedly to stop vexing the injured worker when an appropriate amount has been paid. Well, we have a form letter we can send to such providers to ask them to stand down and stop the prohibited practice. There is always the specter of litigation to stop balance billing practices.

Today, we saw a lawsuit filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Department titled Margaret Kruse v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 12 CH 7786, filed March 2, 2012 in which Plaintiffs are seeking class certification and substantial damages against Illinois’ largest hospital. Plaintiffs are specifically complaining of the fact compensable workers’ compensation medical bills are paid under the Illinois Medical Fee Schedule but Northwestern Memorial Hospital continues to send bills for the balances, then forwards the allegedly unpaid billing to bill collectors to dun the injured workers and finally initiates legal action to obtain payment of bills that are not due.

We have no idea and therefore cannot comment on the merits of the claim but we do feel it is important for our readers to know it is out there. We appreciate your thoughts and comments.

3-9-12; Matt Ignoffo reviews changes likely coming to the Wisconsin worker's compensation system via Agreed Senate Bill 409 which was approved by the WI Senate 33-0 on February 21, 2012 and is...

Here are the highlights:

ü  Under current law, permanent partial disability benefits are subject to maximum weekly compensation rates specified by statute. Currently, the maximum weekly compensation rate for permanent partial disability is $302.00. Bill 409 increases the maximum rate to $312 for injuries occurring before January 1, 2013, and to $322.00 for injuries occurring on or after that date.

ü  This increased cost will potentially be offset by a change in the formula regarding payment of medical bills. Wisconsin does not have a workers’ compensation medical fee schedule. Disputed healthcare charges are reviewed by the Department of Workforce Development (DWD) for reasonableness based on a database maintained by the department to determine an average cost.

ü  Currently, if a medical charge varies by more than 1.4 deviations from the average it will be held to be unreasonable. Under Bill 409 the threshold for reasonableness will be 1.2 deviations.

ü  Regarding vocational rehabilitation, Bill 409 proposes injured workers receiving voc services shall not have their TTD reduced on account of wages earned for the first 24 hours worked in a week while receiving voc. Wages earned for hours worked in excess of 24 during a week shall be offset against the worker’s average weekly wage in calculating compensation for temporary disability.

ü  This bill would prohibit the DWD from allowing compensation for permanent disfigurement for an employee who returns to work for his or her employer at the time of injury, or who is offered employment with that employer, unless the employee suffers an actual wage loss due to the disfigurement.

This article was researched and written by Matthew Ignoffo, J.D., licensed in IL and WI who can be reached at mignoffo@keefe-law.com.

3-9-12; Technology can save you plenty……Check the Footage!!

We have had several questions in the last few weeks with regard to accident investigations including both the use of webcams for recorded statements and time frames for saving security footage to complete investigations. In our view, the better you investigate an accident, the better chance you have of being sure you are paying what you owe for accepted claims, fighting claims that can and should be fought and avoiding future safety concerns that can cause thousands of dollars in lost wages and medical bills.

As we have indicated throughout the past few years, technology has become so advanced it is now so simple to obtain an inexpensive webcam to obtain your recorded accident/witness statements. Memories get fuzzy and people move on so there is nothing more helpful than being able to view the statements and determine the demeanor of the party providing the statement.

There was also a recent news story running on national media outlets which has been sent to us by multiple readers which shows one area of value from checking your loss prevention video footage immediately upon report of an accident. In many cases the footage is only available for weeks at most and checking/saving the footage helps make determinations in compensability. In one instance, you can confirm the accident occurred and be able to make determinations confirming compensability to avoid delays in treatment or benefit approval which many times lead to litigation and increased costs.

In other arguably rare instances, you may find that an “accident” involves elaborate staging and injuries which are questionably related to work. As reported from several sources, including at  http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/2012/02/authorities_north_bergen_targe.html, a well-known U.S. retailer had an employee who police say staged an elaborate scheme in an effort to fake an accident and collect workers' compensation apparently forgot cameras were rolling. The employee alleged boxes fell from a shelf as she bumped it, causing additional boxes to fall upon her and then caused her to vomit.

According to the reports, there is a 10-minute segment of video which shows the employee:

  • Loosened a shelf in the storeroom that caused the boxes to fall when she bumped into it
  • Positioned herself under the boxes before pulling a shopping cart containing additional items onto herself
  • After another employee responded to calls for help and left to gain other assistance, the allegedly injured employee hit herself in the head with what appeared to be batteries several times
  • The allegedly injured employee left the area, returned with a beverage and what appears to be Goldfish crackers and after eating some crackers and drinking some of the beverage, knelt down and vomited.
  • And finally, the allegedly injured employee left again, then returned and re-staged the accident scene before taking pictures of it.

The employee later put in a claim for workers’ compensation, saying she suffered neck and back injuries. She was subsequently arrested on Jan. 17 and is currently out on bail. The charge carries a possible penalty of up to 10 years in prison upon conviction.

The most common primary comment from local sources we have spoken with indicated surprise the allegedly injured employee has already been arrested and charged with a crime, with every single one of them confirming they did not believe such cases would be prosecuted with such vigor in Illinois, even in the face of video evidence.

Brief research finds internet searches for workers’ compensation fraud in Illinois returns results mostly referring to changes in the IL WC Act in the past 7 years. The most significant examples of WC fraud prosecution actually appear to result from employers using the civil process to obtain judgments against miscreants. The point of this article is-–check your security footage promptly and routinely save it. Consider webcam statements to lock in the statements of any and all witnesses including claimant. For every case which may be WC fraud, there are likely to be many more where you may also avoid unnecessary expenses with a prompt determination of a compensable claim.

This article was researched and written by Shawn R Biery JD, MSCC and he can be reached at sbiery@keefe-law.com or call him directly at 312-756-3701.